Community | Enrollment | School $ | Library $ | Ratio |
Holyoke, MA | 5,316 | $797,400 | $40,000 | 19.9 |
Chandler, AZ | 42,876 | $6,431,400 | $124,500 | 51.7 |
Denver, CO | 70,717 | $10,607,550 | $752,137 | 14.1 |
Gilpin County, CO | 434 | $65,100 | $12,000 | 5.4 |
Taylor County, FL | 3,040 | $456,000 | $7,158 | 63.7 |
Broward County, FL | 222,527 | $33,379,050 | $1,447,408 | 23.1 |
The last column shows the multiple of funding that the school district gets. What is a fair multiple? Well, you're not likely to think that both 14:1 and 51:1 are both fair, so everyone will find that unfair in at least a couple of cases. So no matter what you think is fair, not every library will get a fair amount of funding.
Taking a step back, the real funding problem for libraries is not going to be the $1/sq.ft. formula. Most libraries don't apply for the E-Rate, and even fewer are going to apply for C2 (since it requires CIPA compliance).
It gets even worse: now that they're phasing out voice service, a single-site library that's not CIPA-compliant is eligible for $0 in E-Rate funding. The only service left in the program that does not require CIPA compliance is digital transmission service (DTS) purchased from a telecommunications carrier. Single-site applicants generally don't need DTS, so they'll get bupkus.
Take that, rural libraries.
I perused a couple of documents showing square feet per capita:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.hayward-ca.gov/CITY-GOVERNMENT/DEPARTMENTS/LIBRARY-&-COMMUNITY-SERVICES/DOCUMENTS/2013/sf-per-capita.pdf
http://dlis.dos.state.fl.us/bld/research_office/fy2010/pdfs/14SquareFeetPerCapitaFY2009-2010.pdf
http://public.tableausoftware.com/profile/#!/vizhome/2013CTLibraryStatisticsAll/LibraryUseStats
They show a wide range of values for square feet per capita, generally from about 0.2 to 2, with some further outliers.
Here's a comparison of state averages (Table 29):
http://www.imls.gov/assets/1/News/PLS2009.pdf
The low is 0.395; the high is 2.178.
If the goal was to distribute the funding evenly to all library patrons, it doesn't seem like the $1/sq.ft. method really does the job. On the other hand, I think in most libraries, the need for access points is more likely to be determined by the size of the space to be covered than by the number of patrons, so maybe using building size is fair.
The Urban Library Council has filed a comment to to FCC (http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7521371826), supported by many other libraries, supporting an increase to $4/sq.ft. Or $150 per average daily visitor.
ReplyDeleteIt sounds like the final order will have $2.30/sq.ft., so libraries will get 2.3 times as much as I put in the table above.
ReplyDelete