Yesterday, yet another appeal was filed by an applicant that lost funding due to the bogus "two-signature/two-date" (2s/2d) rule. I've written before about the rule that will not die. This appeal says that as of January 16, 2007, 2s/2d is alive and well.
The FCC needs to put an end to this. We need the FCC to say exactly what constitutes a contract for E-Rate purposes (let's hope they just defer to state law), and in addition to explicitly state that a contract does not require two dates to be a valid contract.
No comments:
Post a Comment