More than 3 years after Mel promised they would modernize their online tools, USAC has asked for comments about "the E-rate program IT modernization (SLITM)." Gotta love an acronym that isn't even based on a title. It should be E-RITM. Or maybe hyphens don't make it into acronyms, but Program should be in the title, so it's ERPITM.
What, you thought that just because I whine incessantly about USAC's IT infrastructure, I would focus my comments on the substance of the RFC?
Most of my complaints are at a more granular level than the RFC. They have statements like, "Offer redundant navigation for ambiguous situations to allow external users to reach the correct outcome," while I think in terms like, "Let me use my browser's Back button without wacky results."
No comments:
Post a Comment