An Erratum to the recent Bishop Perry decision has been released which corrects a reference to the Form 486 in the Introduction to the decision. The reference was a little odd in the first place: the 486 is not mentioned anywhere else in the decision, which deals only with the 470 and 471.
So it's got me thinking: was some FCC staffer working simultaneously on an analogous decision concerning 486es, and made a little cut-and-paste mistake?
No comments:
Post a Comment